America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo

Public Health Funding in South Dakota
search
South Dakota
search

Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.

South Dakota Value:

$231

State dollars dedicated to public health per person (including federal grants directed to states from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Health Resources & Services Administration) (2-year estimate)

South Dakota Rank:

13

Public Health Funding in depth:

Appears In:

Public Health Funding by State

State dollars dedicated to public health per person (including federal grants directed to states from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Health Resources & Services Administration) (2-year estimate)

Search by State
Search for a state or tap below

Data from CDC, HRSA and Trust for America's Health, 2021-2022

>= $238

$199 - $237

$181 - $198

$145 - $180

<= $144

• Data Unavailable
Top StatesRankValue
Your StateRankValue
Bottom StatesRankValue

Public Health Funding

1$465
4$319
5$255
9$241
11$232
11$232
14$230
15$222
17$213
18$210
19$203
20$199
22$196
23$194
24$192
25$190
26$187
27$184
28$183
28$183
32$172
33$171
34$169
36$157
37$153
38$152
39$151
41$143
42$139
43$138
44$137
47$135
47$135
49$128
49$128
Data Unavailable
Source:
  • CDC, HRSA and Trust for America's Health, 2021-2022

Public Health Funding Trends

State dollars dedicated to public health per person (including federal grants directed to states from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Health Resources & Services Administration) (2-year estimate)

Compare States
plus

About Public Health Funding

US Value: $183

Top State(s): Alaska: $465

Bottom State(s): Michigan, Wisconsin: $128

Definition: State dollars dedicated to public health per person (including federal grants directed to states from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the Health Resources & Services Administration) (2-year estimate)

Data Source and Years(s): CDC, HRSA and Trust for America's Health, 2021-2022

Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of CDC, HRSA and Trust for America's Health, United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2024.

Public health funding saves lives and money. The United States public health system aims to keep Americans safe and healthy through prevention, preparedness and surveillance programs, and serves as the first line of defense against epidemics. Increased spending on public health programs is associated with a decrease in mortality from preventable causes such as cardiovascular disease, diabetes, stroke and cancer.

Public health program spending accounts for less than 10% of all health care expenditures in most countries, yet its impact can be substantial. An investment of $10 per person per year in evidence-based community health programs could save the U.S. more than $16 billion annually. That is a potential savings of $5.60 for every $1 invested. The public health response to the recent COVID-19 pandemic exposed critical weaknesses caused by chronic underfunding of these systems at state and national levels, driving home the importance of prioritizing this area.

Populations that are most affected by public health funding include: 

  • Children and infants: Financial coverage for childhood immunizations and developmental screenings are crucial for protecting infants and children from potentially life-threatening preventable diseases early in life when they are most vulnerable.
  • Low-resource communities: People living in these communities experience the largest health and economic benefits from increased local public health spending. 
  • Medicare enrollees: A 2017 study found that a 10% increase in local public health spending per capita was associated with decreases in Medicare expenditures, particularly among low-income and low-access populations.

The Affordable Care Act established the Prevention and Public Health Fund to expand and sustain national investments in evidence-based strategies to improve health outcomes and health care quality. The Prevention Fund supports $903 million in Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) grants for public health programs throughout the U.S., including efforts to reduce tobacco use, increase vaccine access and expand mental health and injury prevention programs.

The effectiveness of a public health intervention, in part, depends on the resources of the community receiving the intervention. Studies have found that public health interventions focusing on behavioral changes are more successful in populations with high socioeconomic status, while those with low socioeconomic status or other disadvantages benefit less from these interventions. Effective interventions must therefore adopt a social determinants of health lens, which recognizes the conditions in which people live, work and play as key influences on and indicators of health. 

State and local health departments are primarily responsible for funding and implementing public health activities, with supplemental financial support from federal agencies. Between the CDC’s steadily decreasing budget between 2010 and 2020 and disparities in state resources, this means that health departments are relying on inconsistent streams of public health dollars to provide necessary services. In order to reduce disparities and improve the state of public health for all Americans, it is critical that state and federal governments prioritize adequate and sustained funding for local health departments.

 

Baum, Fran, and Matthew Fisher. “Why Behavioural Health Promotion Endures despite Its Failure to Reduce Health Inequities.” Sociology of Health & Illness 36, no. 2 (2014): 213–25. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/1467-9566.12112.

Johns, Marquisha, and Jill Rosenthal. “How Investing in Public Health Will Strengthen America’s Health.” Center for American Progress, May 17, 2022. https://www.americanprogress.org/article/how-investing-in-public-health-will-strengthen-americas-health/.

Levi, Jeffrey, Laura M. Segal, and Chrissie Juliano. “Prevention for a Healthier America: Investments in Disease Prevention Yield Significant Savings, Stronger Communities.” Issue Report. Washington, D.C.: Trust for America’s Health, February 2009. https://www.tfah.org/wp-content/uploads/archive/reports/prevention08/Prevention08.pdf.

Mays, Glen P., and Cezar B. Mamaril. “Public Health Spending and Medicare Resource Use: A Longitudinal Analysis of U.S. Communities.” Health Services Research 52, no. S2 (2017): 2357–77. https://doi.org/doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12785.

Mays, Glen P., and Sharla A. Smith. “Evidence Links Increases in Public Health Spending to Declines in Preventable Deaths.” Health Affairs 30, no. 8 (August 2011): 1585–93. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0196.

McKillop, Matt, and Dara Alpert Lieberman. “The Impact of Chronic Underfunding on America’s Public Health System: Trends, Risks, and Recommendations, 2021.” Issue Report. Washington, D.C.: Trust for America’s Health, May 2021. https://www.tfah.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/2021_PHFunding_Fnl.pdf.

McKillop, Matt, and Dara Alpert Lieberman. “The Impact of Chronic Underfunding on America’s Public Health System: Trends, Risks, and Recommendations, 2022.” Issue Report. Washington, D.C.: Trust for America’s Health, July 2022. https://www.tfah.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/2022PublicHealthFundingFINAL.pdf.

Richardson, Ann K. “Investing in Public Health: Barriers and Possible Solutions.” Journal of Public Health 34, no. 3 (August 2012): 322–27. https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fds039.

Sen-Crowe, Brendon, Mark McKenney, and Adel Elkbuli. “Public Health Prevention and Emergency Preparedness Funding in the United States: Are We Ready for the next Pandemic?” Annals of Medicine and Surgery 59 (November 2020): 242–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.10.007.

Current Reports

America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.

We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.