Concentrated Disadvantage in Texas

Texas

Concentrated disadvantage measures community well-being by examining multiple aspects of geographically concentrated poverty, economic segregation and other population characteristics. Concentrated disadvantage considers poverty, unemployment, use of public assistance programs and density of female-headed households and households with children. Studies have found that living in areas of higher community socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with:

• Preterm birth.
• Decreased cognitive abilities.
• Lack of access to healthy foods and recreational areas.
• Environmental hazards, including lead exposure, poor air quality and substandard housing.
• Chronic conditions such as obesity, asthma, depression, anxiety and sexually transmitted infections.

Historical housing policies and other factors related to residential segregation have led to more children of color living in areas of concentrated disadvantage. Across all income levels, Black families live in neighborhoods with higher poverty rates than their white counterparts. Studies have found that women living in disadvantaged neighborhoods face higher risks of mental and physical health problems and are more likely to experience violence and mortality compared with their male counterparts.

To make impactful changes at the community level in areas of high concentrated disadvantage, multifactorial strategies may combine a number of approaches that foster economic opportunity, increase educational attainment, improve workplace conditions or expand access to quality nutrition, health care and housing. Solutions to address concentrated disadvantage and its repercussions fall into two main categories: 

1. Investing in communities. Programs that aim to enrich and empower areas facing concentrated disadvantage by improving living and economic conditions may have greater long-term impact, especially if they address the complexities of poverty. One such program, the Best Babies Zone Initiative, helps reduce poor birth outcomes in disadvantaged areas by uniting neighborhood leaders, improving education and the built environment and promoting economic and community development. Investing in affordable housing and public education systems are other long-term strategies to reduce concentrated disadvantage. 
2. Promoting social and physical mobility to break down barriers of segregation. Programs that allow families to move away from an area of concentrated disadvantage have shown a positive impact on long-term economic, educational and health outcomes. The positive impact, however, is seen primarily in young children; moving at age 13 or older can negatively affect long-term outcomes.

Healthy People 2030 has several objectives related to the components of concentrated disadvantage, including reducing the proportion of people living in poverty and increasing employment among working-age people.

Allegretto, Sylvia, Emma García, and Elaine Weiss. Public Education Funding in the U.S. Needs an Overhaul. Report. Washington, D.C.: Economic Policy Institute, July 12, 2022. https://epi.org/233143.

Burgos Ochoa, Lizbeth, Maarten J. Bijlsma, Eric A. P. Steegers, Jasper V. Been, and Loes C. M. Bertens. “Does Neighborhood Crime Mediate the Relationship Between Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Birth Outcomes? An Application of the Mediational G-Formula.” American Journal of Epidemiology 192, no. 6 (June 2, 2023): 939–48. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwad037.

Chan, Elizabeth W., Felix Cheung, and Michael J. Widener. “Leisure for Whom? Socioeconomic Disparities in the Well-Being Benefits of Third Places.” Wellbeing, Space and Society 10 (June 1, 2026): 100337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wss.2025.100337.

Chetty, Raj, Nathaniel Hendren, and Lawrence F. Katz. “The Effects of Exposure to Better Neighborhoods on Children: New Evidence from the Moving to Opportunity Experiment.” American Economic Review 106, no. 4 (April 2016): 855–902. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20150572.

Christie-Mizell, C. André. “Neighborhood Disadvantage and Poor Health: The Consequences of Race, Gender, and Age Among Young Adults.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, no. 13 (July 1, 2022): 8107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19138107.

Mehra, Renee, Fatma M. Shebl, Shayna D. Cunningham, Urania Magriples, Eric Barrette, Carolina Herrera, Katy B. Kozhimannil, and Jeannette R. Ickovics. “Area-Level Deprivation and Preterm Birth: Results from a National, Commercially-Insured Population.” BMC Public Health 19, no. 1 (December 2019): 236. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-6533-7.

Odoms-Young, Angela, Alison G. M. Brown, Tanya Agurs-Collins, and Karen Glanz. “Food Insecurity, Neighborhood Food Environment, and Health Disparities: State of the Science, Research Gaps and Opportunities,” The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 119, no. 3 (March 2024): 850–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.12.019.

Pies, Cheri, Monica Barr, Carly Strouse, and Milton Kotelchuck. “Growing a Best Babies Zone: Lessons Learned from the Pilot Phase of a Multi-Sector, Place-Based Initiative to Reduce Infant Mortality.” Maternal and Child Health Journal 20, no. 5 (May 2016): 968–73. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-016-1969-1.

Rautava, Samuli, Hanna Lagström, Olli Turta, Mirkka Lahdenperä, Jaana Pentti, Mika Kivimäki, and Jussi Vahtera. “Neighbourhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage and the Risk of Preterm Delivery.” BMJ Paediatrics Open 10, no. 1 (April 20, 2026). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2025-004200.

Sacks, Vanessa. 5 Ways Neighborhoods of Concentrated Disadvantage Harm Children. Research Brief. Child Trends, February 14, 2018. https://www.childtrends.org/publications/5-ways-neighborhoods-of-concentrated-disadvantage-harm-children.

Taylor, Rita L., Shelly R. Cooper, and Joshua J. Jackson. “Assessment of Neighborhood Poverty, Cognitive Function, and Prefrontal and Hippocampal Volumes in Children,” Pediatrics, 3, no. 11 (November 3, 2020). https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23774.