America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo

Dedicated Health Care Provider - Ages 65+
Dedicated Health Care Provider - Ages 65+ in Mississippi
Mississippi

Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.

How to use this page

Mississippi Value:

96.1%

Percentage of adults ages 65 and older who reported having a personal doctor or health care provider

Mississippi Rank:

27

Dedicated Health Care Provider - Ages 65+ in depth:

Explore Population Data:

General Population

Appears In:

Dedicated Health Care Provider - Ages 65+ by State

Percentage of adults ages 65 and older who reported having a personal doctor or health care provider




Dedicated Health Care Provider - Ages 65+ Trends

Percentage of adults ages 65 and older who reported having a personal doctor or health care provider

Trend: Dedicated Health Care Provider - Ages 65+ in Mississippi, United States, 2023 Senior Report

Percentage of adults ages 65 and older who reported having a personal doctor or health care provider

Mississippi
United States
Source:

 CDC, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System

View All Populations
Compare States

Dedicated Health Care Provider - Ages 65+

Trend: Dedicated Health Care Provider - Ages 65+ in Mississippi, United States, 2023 Senior Report

Percentage of adults ages 65 and older who reported having a personal doctor or health care provider

Mississippi
United States
Source:

 CDC, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System






About Dedicated Health Care Provider - Ages 65+

US Value: 96.1%

Top State(s): Rhode Island: 98.5%

Bottom State(s): Alaska: 90.9%

Definition: Percentage of adults ages 65 and older who reported having a personal doctor or health care provider

Data Source and Years: CDC, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2021

Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of CDC, Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2023.

Individuals with a dedicated health care provider are better positioned to receive care that can prevent, detect and manage health conditions than those without a dedicated provider. Primary care providers are an integral part of the health and well-being of individuals, particularly older adults. Having a regular health care provider helps patients and providers build stable, long-term relationships that are associated with several benefits, including:

For older adults, obstacles to obtaining a dedicated health care provider include limited availability of services, financial constraints, lack of proper insurance coverage, lack of culturally competent care and language and transportation barriers.

The percentage of older adults with a dedicated health care provider is higher among: 

  • Women compared with men.
  • Asian, white and Black adults compared with Hispanic and American Indian/Alaska Native adults.
  • Those with higher levels of education compared with those with less than a high school education.
  • Those with higher levels of income compared with those with an annual household income of less than $25,000.
  • Those living in metropolitan areas compared with those in non-metropolitan areas.

Strategies for increasing the prevalence of adults with a dedicated health care provider include:

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services provides a list of Medicare-enrolled physicians and health care professionals by region that can be used to find local providers.

Increasing the proportion of individuals of all ages with a usual primary care provider is a Healthy People 2030 leading health indicator.

Blewett, Lynn A., Pamela Jo Johnson, Brian Lee, and Peter B. Scal. 2008. “When a Usual Source of Care and Usual Provider Matter: Adult Prevention and Screening Services.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 23 (9): 1354–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0659-0.

Bodenheimer, Thomas S., and Mark D. Smith. 2013. “Primary Care: Proposed Solutions To The Physician Shortage Without Training More Physicians.” Health Affairs 32 (11): 1881–86. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2013.0234.

Douthit, Nathan T., Sakal Kiv, Tzvi Dwolatzky, and Seema Biswas. 2015. “Exposing Some Important Barriers to Health Care Access in the Rural USA.” Public Health 129 (6): 611–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2015.04.001.

Friedberg, Mark W., Peter S. Hussey, and Eric C. Schneider. 2010. “Primary Care: A Critical Review Of The Evidence On Quality And Costs Of Health Care.” Health Affairs 29 (5): 766–72. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0025.

Garfield, Rachel, and Kendal Orgera. 2019. “The Uninsured and the ACA: A Primer — Key Facts about Health Insurance and the Uninsured amidst Changes to the Affordable Care Act.” KFF. https://files.kff.org/attachment/The-Uninsured-and-the-ACA-A-Primer-Key-Facts-about-Health-Insurance-and-the-Uninsured-amidst-Changes-to-the-Affordable-Care-Act.

Lester, Paula E., T. S. Dharmarajan, and Eleanor Weinstein. 2020. “The Looming Geriatrician Shortage: Ramifications and Solutions.” Journal of Aging and Health 32 (9): 1052–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0898264319879325.

Mainous, Arch G. III, Richard Baker, Margaret M. Love, Denis Pereira Gray, and James M. Gill. 2001. “Continuity of Care and Trust in One’s Physician: Evidence from Primary Care in the United States and the United Kingdom.” Family Medicine 33 (1): 22–27. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11199905/.

Nothelle, Stephanie K., Cynthia Boyd, Orla Sheehan, and Jennifer L. Wolff. 2018. “Factors Associated With Loss of Usual Source of Care Among Older Adults.” The Annals of Family Medicine 16 (6): 538–45. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.2283.

Ponce, Ninez A., Leighton Ku, William E. Cunningham, and E. Richard Brown. 2006. “Language Barriers to Health Care Access among Medicare Beneficiaries.” Inquiry: A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing 43 (1): 66–76. https://doi.org/10.5034/inquiryjrnl_43.1.66.

Rust, George, Jiali Ye, Peter Baltrus, Elvan Daniels, Bamidele Adesunloye, and George Edward Fryer. 2008. “Practical Barriers to Timely Primary Care Access: Impact on Adult Use of Emergency Department Services.” Archives of Internal Medicine 168 (15): 1705–10. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.168.15.1705.

Shi, Leiyu. 2012. “The Impact of Primary Care: A Focused Review.” Scientifica 2012 (December): e432892. https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/432892.

Spatz, Erica S., Joseph S. Ross, Mayur M. Desai, Maureen E. Canavan, and Harlan M. Krumholz. 2010. “Beyond Insurance Coverage: Usual Source of Care in the Treatment of Hypertension and Hypercholesterolemia. Data from the 2003-2006 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.” American Heart Journal 160 (1): 115–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2010.04.013.

Winters, Paul, Daniel Tancredi, and Kevin Fiscella. 2010. “The Role of Usual Source of Care in Cholesterol Treatment.” The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine 23 (2): 179–85. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2010.02.090084.

Wolinsky, Fredric D., Suzanne E. Bentler, Li Liu, John F. Geweke, Elizabeth A. Cook, Maksym Obrizan, Elizabeth A. Chrischilles, et al. 2010. “Continuity of Care with a Primary Care Physician and Mortality in Older Adults.” The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences 65A (4): 421–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glp188.

Xue, Ying, Zhiqiu Ye, Carol Brewer, and Joanne Spetz. 2016. “Impact of State Nurse Practitioner Scope-of-Practice Regulation on Health Care Delivery: Systematic Review.” Nursing Outlook 64 (1): 71–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2015.08.005.

Current Reports

America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.

We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.