We appreciate you taking the time to help America’s Health Rankings better understand our audiences. Your feedback will allow us to optimize our website and provide you with additional resources in the future. Thank you.
Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.
Hawaii Value:
Percentage of housing stock with potential elevated lead risk due to age of housing
Hawaii Rank:
Percentage of housing stock with potential elevated lead risk due to age of housing
4.5% - 9.6%
9.7% - 13.3%
13.4% - 17.6%
17.7% - 22.1%
22.2% - 31.7%
US Value: 16.1 %
Top State(s): Nevada: 4.5 %
Bottom State(s): New York: 31.7 %
Definition: Percentage of housing stock with potential elevated lead risk due to age of housing
Data Source and Years(s): U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 1-Year Dataset, 2024
Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of U.S. Census Bureau, American Community Survey, 1-Year Dataset, United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2026.
Lead, a naturally occurring heavy metal, is highly toxic in large amounts, especially for young children and pregnant people. Harmful amounts of lead can be found in many places, including water pipes, soil and homes built before 1978. Exposure can occur through inhalation, ingestion or skin contact. Once lead enters the body, it is absorbed into the bloodstream and spread throughout the rest of the body, where it can affect other organs and tissues.
There is no known safe level of lead exposure. In 2021, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention lowered the threshold for identifying unsafe levels of lead in the blood to 3.5 µg/dL. Studies found that even low levels of lead, far below the previous threshold of 10 µg/dL, are detrimental to cognitive development in children and can negatively impact intellectual function, attention-related behaviors and academic and cognitive skills well into adolescence and adulthood.
High blood lead levels during pregnancy can be passed onto the developing fetus, which may cause miscarriages, low birth weight infants, preterm births or other health problems.
Housing built before 1978 carries an elevated risk of lead exposure, and housing built before 1950 poses the highest risk. Due to a 1978 ban on lead-based paint, housing built after this year poses minimal risk. Around 29 million houses in the United States have lead-based paint hazards, of which 2.6 million are homes to young children. A study of children ages 6 months to 2 years found that interior renovation of older homes — which often includes painting, sanding, scraping or other activities that might release lead dust into the air — further increases the risk of lead poisoning.
It is estimated that investing in lead paint hazard control in high-risk communities could return $17 to $221 in societal and health costs for each dollar spent.
Populations most vulnerable to environmental lead exposure include:
The only way to stop lead poisoning is to prevent exposure in the first place, since the health effects of lead are permanent. Strategies to reduce the negative consequences of lead exposure include:
The Association of Maternal and Child Health Programs maintains a lead poisoning prevention toolkit and resource index for agencies working to prevent lead exposure.
Bellinger, David C. “Very Low Lead Exposures and Children’s Neurodevelopment.” Current Opinion in Pediatrics 20, no. 2 (April 2008): 172–77. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOP.0b013e3282f4f97b.
Garrison, Veronica E. H., and Peter J. Ashley. “Identifying Jurisdictions at Risk of Containing Housing Units With Deteriorated Paint: Results and Targeting Implications for the US Department of Housing and Urban Development.” Journal of Public Health Management & Practice 27, no. 6 (November 2021): 546–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/PHH.0000000000001191.
Gould, Elise. “Childhood Lead Poisoning: Conservative Estimates of the Social and Economic Benefits of Lead Hazard Control.” Environmental Health Perspectives 117, no. 7 (July 2009): 1162–67. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2717145/.
Jordan, Catherine M., Becky L. Yust, Leslie L. Robison, Peter Hannan, and Amos S. Deinard. “A Randomized Trial of Education to Prevent Lead Burden in Children at High Risk for Lead Exposure: Efficacy as Measured by Blood Lead Monitoring.” Environmental Health Perspectives 111, no. 16 (December 2003): 1947–51. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1241771/.
Lanphear, Bruce P., Kim Dietrich, Peggy Auinger, and Christopher Cox. “Cognitive Deficits Associated with Blood Lead Concentrations <10 Pg/dL in US Children and Adolescents.” Public Health Reports 115, no. 6 (2000): 521–29. https://doi.org/10.1093/phr/115.6.521.
Lanphear, Bruce P., Richard Hornung, Jane Khoury, Kimberly Yolton, Peter Baghurst, David C. Bellinger, Richard L. Canfield, et al. “Low-Level Environmental Lead Exposure and Children’s Intellectual Function: An International Pooled Analysis.” Environmental Health Perspectives 113, no. 7 (July 2005): 894–99. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1257652/
Roberts, David J., Sally M. Bradberry, Frances Butcher, and Araceli Busby. “Lead Exposure in Children.” BMJ 377 (April 7, 2022): e063950. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj-2020-063950.
Ruckart, Perri Zeitz, Robert L. Jones, Joseph G. Courtney, Tanya Telfair LeBlanc, Wilma Jackson, Mateusz P. Karwowski, Po-Yung Cheng, Paul Allwood, Erik R. Svendsen, and Patrick N. Breysse. “Update of the Blood Lead Reference Value — United States, 2021.” MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 70, no. 43 (October 29, 2021): 1509–12. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7043a4.
Spanier, Adam J., Stephen Wilson, Mona Ho, Richard Hornung, and Bruce P. Lanphear. “The Contribution of Housing Renovation to Children’s Blood Lead Levels: A Cohort Study.” Environmental Health 12 (August 27, 2013): 72.https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-12-72.
America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.
We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.