We appreciate you taking the time to help America’s Health Rankings better understand our audiences. Your feedback will allow us to optimize our website and provide you with additional resources in the future. Thank you.
Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.
Tennessee Value:
Percentage of women with a recent live birth who experienced violence by a husband or partner (current or former) in the 12 months before pregnancy
Percentage of women with a recent live birth who experienced violence by a husband or partner (current or former) in the 12 months before pregnancy
1.2% - 1.6%
1.7% - 2.2%
2.3% - 2.5%
2.6% - 3.4%
3.5% - 4.9%
No Data
Top State(s): Rhode Island: 1.2 %
Bottom State(s): Missouri: 4.9 %
Definition: Percentage of women with a recent live birth who experienced violence by a husband or partner (current or former) in the 12 months before pregnancy
Data Source and Years(s): U.S. Department for Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), 2023
Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of U.S. Department for Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Division of Reproductive Health, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System (PRAMS), United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2026.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) defines intimate partner violence (IPV) as physical violence, sexual violence, stalking or psychological aggression (including coercive tactics) by a current or past partner (spouse, boyfriend/girlfriend, dating partner or continuous sexual partner). Research has shown that women are more likely to be victims of IPV than men, and experience a greater range and severity of consequences from IPV compared with men. IPV can lead to lasting physical and mental health issues, including post-traumatic stress disorder, unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and multiple chronic conditions.
Women who experience IPV during the preconception or prenatal period are less likely to receive adequate prenatal care. IPV during pregnancy has added negative outcomes such as: depression and substance use during pregnancy, and poor infant birth outcomes. Homicide is the leading cause of death among pregnant and postpartum women, with more than twice the prevalence of any other cause of maternal mortality. More than half of all female homicides are related to IPV.
According to the National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey, 41% of women in the United States report experiencing some form of IPV in their lifetime. The true prevalence of IPV is unknown due to underreporting. Underreporting may also be higher among certain populations, as cultural background, socioeconomic status and age affect whether and how individuals talk about IPV.
Risk factors for IPV include conflict or economic stress within a relationship and male dominance in the family. Individuals who experience IPV during the preconception or prenatal period are at increased risk of:
A 2017 study calculated the lifetime cost of intimate partner violence at $103,767 per female victim, representing a total economic burden of $3.6 trillion.
The prevalence of intimate partner violence among women is higher among:
The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommends that clinicians screen all women of reproductive age (18-44) for IPV, including those who are pregnant or postpartum, and connect those who screen positive to intervention services.
In a survey of women who had recently given birth, more than half of those who reported experiencing physical partner violence said they were not screened for IPV in the 12 months before pregnancy. Some barriers to screening identified by providers include time constraints during a visit, personal discomfort and not knowing what to do if a patient is experiencing IPV. In response, the CDC has developed shorter IPV screening questionnaires for providers and is working on developing additional guidance to assist patients experiencing IPV. For example, asking patients specific behavioral questions and avoiding loaded terms like “abuse” can improve the outcome of IPV screenings.
There are several strategies for preventing IPV, such as:
For those who may be experiencing IPV, the CDC has a list of resources, support organizations and helplines for those who may be experiencing IPV.
Healthy People 2030 has identified the need to reduce intimate partner violence as an important public health issue and currently has an objective in developmental status.
Bailey, Beth A. “Partner Violence During Pregnancy: Prevalence, Effects, Screening, and Management.” International Journal of Women’s Health 2 (June 28, 2010): 183–97. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S8632.
Basile, Kathleen C., Marci F. Hertz, and Sudie E. Back. Intimate Partner Violence and Sexual Violence Victimization Assessment Instruments for Use in Healthcare Settings: Version 1. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, 2007. https://permanent.fdlp.gov/gpo36292/ipvandsvscreening.pdf.
Chen, Zhou, Wen Ma, Ying Li, Wei Guo, Wang Senhu, Wansu Zhang, and Yunsong Chen. “Using Machine Learning to Estimate the Incidence Rate of Intimate Partner Violence.” Scientific Reports 13, no. 1 (2023): 5533. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31846-8.
Fanslow, Janet L., Brooklyn M. Mellar, Pauline J. Gulliver, and Tracey K. D. McIntosh. “Evidence of Gender Asymmetry in Intimate Partner Violence Experience at the Population-Level.” Journal of Interpersonal Violence 38, no. 15–16 (August 2023): 9159–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605231163646.
Kozhimannil, Katy B., Valerie A. Lewis, Julia D. Interrante, Phoebe L. Chastain, and Lindsay Admon. “Screening for and Experiences of Intimate Partner Violence in the United States Before, During, and After Pregnancy, 2016–2019.” American Journal of Public Health 113, no. 3 (March 2023): 297–305. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2022.307195.
Niolon, Phyllis Holditch, Megan Kearns, Jenny Dills, Kirsten Rambo, Shalon Irving, Theresa L. Armstead, and Leah Gilbert. Intimate Partner Violence Prevention: Resource for Action. Atlanta, GA: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017. https://www.cdc.gov/violence-prevention/media/pdf/resources-for-action/IPV-Prevention-Resource_508.pdf.
Paterno, Mary T., and Jessica E. Draughon. “Screening for Intimate Partner Violence.” Journal of Midwifery & Women’s Health 61, no. 3 (May 1, 2016): 370–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.12443.
Petrosky, Emiko, Janet M. Blair, Carter J. Betz, Katherine A. Fowler, Shane P. D. Jack, and Bridget H. Lyons. “Racial and Ethnic Differences in Homicides of Adult Women and the Role of Intimate Partner Violence — United States, 2003–2014.” Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 66, no. 28 (July 21, 2017): 741–46. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6628a1.
Ramaswamy, Amrutha, Usha Ranji, and Alina Salganicoff. Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) Screening and Counseling Services in Clinical Settings. Issue Brief. KFF, December 2, 2019. https://www.kff.org/womens-health-policy/issue-brief/intimate-partner-violence-ipv-screening-and-counseling-services-in-clinical-settings/.
Steele-Baser, Megan, Alyssa L. Brown, Denise V. D’Angelo, Kathleen C. Basile, Rosalyn D. Lee, Antoinette T. Nguyen, and Cynthia H. Cassell. “Intimate Partner Violence and Pregnancy and Infant Health Outcomes — Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System, Nine U.S. Jurisdictions, 2016–2022.” MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 73, no. 48 (December 5, 2024): 1093–98. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7348a1.
Testa, Alexander, Jacqueline Lee, Daniel C. Semenza, Dylan B. Jackson, Kyle T. Ganson, and Jason M. Nagata. “Intimate Partner Violence and Barriers to Prenatal Care.” Social Science & Medicine 320 (March 2023): 115700. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115700.
Wallace, Maeve, Veronica Gillispie-Bell, Kiara Cruz, Kelly Davis, and Dovile Vilda. “Homicide During Pregnancy and the Postpartum Period in the United States, 2018–2019.” Obstetrics & Gynecology 138, no. 5 (November 2021): 762–69. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004567.
Yakubovich, Alexa R., Heidi Stöckl, Joseph Murray, G. J. Melendez-Torres, Janina I. Steinert, Calla E. Y. Glavin, and David K. Humphreys. “Risk and Protective Factors for Intimate Partner Violence Against Women: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Prospective–Longitudinal Studies.” American Journal of Public Health 108, no. 7 (July 2018): e1–11.https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304428.
America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.
We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.