We appreciate you taking the time to help America’s Health Rankings better understand our audiences. Your feedback will allow us to optimize our website and provide you with additional resources in the future. Thank you.
Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.
Indiana Value:
Percentage of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65-74 with three or more chronic conditions enrolled in the fee-for-service program
Indiana Rank:
Additional Measures:
Explore Population Data:
Appears In:
Percentage of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65-74 with three or more chronic conditions enrolled in the fee-for-service program
36% - 45%
46% - 50%
51% - 55%
56% - 57%
58% - 65%
US Value: 53 %
Top State(s): Wyoming: 36 %
Bottom State(s): Alabama: 65 %
Definition: Percentage of Medicare beneficiaries ages 65-74 with three or more chronic conditions enrolled in the fee-for-service program
Data Source and Years(s): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Minority Health, Mapping Medicare Disparities Tool, 2023
Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Office of Minority Health, Mapping Medicare Disparities Tool, United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2026.
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention defines chronic conditions as any condition that lasts more than a year and has one or both of the following characteristics: requires ongoing medical attention and/or results in limitations of daily living. Chronic health conditions include physical and mental illnesses, such as diabetes, heart disease and depression. Adults with multiple chronic conditions represent one of the highest-need segments of the population, as each chronic condition may require additional medication and monitoring. As the number of chronic conditions an individual has increases, the risks of the following outcomes also increase:
The prevalence of multiple chronic conditions is higher among adults age 65 and older who are enrolled in both Medicare and Medicaid, compared with those enrolled in Medicare only (excluding Medicare Advantage). Among adults ages 60-79, the prevalence of individual chronic conditions varies substantially by race and ethnicity, but there is less racial/ethnic disparity in the prevalence of multiple chronic conditions.
Aging increases the risk of chronic diseases such as heart disease, cancer and Type 2 diabetes. However, there are actions individuals can take to reduce that risk and maintain their health, including:
Community-level public health strategies to prevent multiple chronic conditions among older adults include:
The Health in Aging Foundation offers tips to help older adults with multiple chronic conditions navigate the patient/provider relationship and manage their care effectively. County Health Rankings & Roadmaps has a page on evidence-based chronic disease management programs. Additionally, the Community Preventive Services Task Force recommends comprehensive telehealth interventions for managing chronic conditions affected by diet, as well as text messaging interventions for medication adherence.
While Healthy People 2030 does not have an objective specific to multiple chronic conditions, it has many objectives around individual chronic conditions, including:
Boersma, Peter, Lindsey I. Black, and Brian W. Ward. “Prevalence of Multiple Chronic Conditions Among US Adults, 2018.” Preventing Chronic Disease 17 (September 17, 2020): 200130. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd17.200130.
Davis, James, Janell Penha, Omar Mbowe, and Deborah A. Taira. “Prevalence of Single and Multiple Leading Causes of Death by Race/Ethnicity Among US Adults Aged 60 to 79 Years.” Preventing Chronic Disease 14 (October 19, 2017): 160241. https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd14.160241.
Newman, Daniel, Michelle Tong, Erica Levine, and Sandeep Kishore. “Prevalence of Multiple Chronic Conditions by U.S. State and Territory, 2017.” Edited by Lucy Busija. PLoS ONE 15, no. 5 (May 5, 2020): e0232346. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232346.
Rizzuto, Debora, René J. F. Melis, Sara Angleman, Chengxuan Qiu, and Alessandra Marengoni. “Effect of Chronic Diseases and Multimorbidity on Survival and Functioning in Elderly Adults.” Journal of the American Geriatrics Society 65, no. 5 (May 2017): 1056–60. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14868.
Taylor, Christopher A., Erin D. Bouldin, Kurt J. Greenlund, and Lisa C. McGuire. “Comorbid Chronic Conditions Among Older Adults with Subjective Cognitive Decline, United States, 2015–2017.” Edited by Steven M. Albert. Innovation in Aging 4, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1093/geroni/igz045.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. “Multiple Chronic Conditions—A Strategic Framework: Optimum Health and Quality of Life for Individuals With Multiple Chronic Conditions.” Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2010. https://www.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/ash/initiatives/mcc/mcc_framework.pdf.
Vogeli, Christine, Alexandra E. Shields, Todd A. Lee, Teresa B. Gibson, William D. Marder, Kevin B. Weiss, and David Blumenthal. “Multiple Chronic Conditions: Prevalence, Health Consequences, and Implications for Quality, Care Management, and Costs.” Journal of General Internal Medicine 22, no. S3 (December 2007): 391–95. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0322-1.
Wolff, Jennifer L., Barbara Starfield, and Gerard Anderson. “Prevalence, Expenditures, and Complications of Multiple Chronic Conditions in the Elderly.” Archives of Internal Medicine 162, no. 20 (November 11, 2002): 2269–76. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.162.20.2269.
America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.
We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.
