We appreciate you taking the time to help America’s Health Rankings better understand our audiences. Your feedback will allow us to optimize our website and provide you with additional resources in the future. Thank you.
Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.
Missouri Value:
Number of active primary care providers (including general practice, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, geriatrics and internal medicine physicians, as well as physician assistants and nurse practitioners) per 100,000 population
Missouri Rank:
Number of active primary care providers (including general practice, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, geriatrics and internal medicine physicians, as well as physician assistants and nurse practitioners) per 100,000 population
548.9 - 349.1
349.0 - 318.4
318.3 - 290.9
290.8 - 268.3
268.2 - 225.0
US Value: 291.4
Top State(s): Massachusetts: 400.2
Bottom State(s): Texas: 225.0
Definition: Number of active primary care providers (including general practice, family practice, obstetrics and gynecology, pediatrics, geriatrics and internal medicine physicians, as well as physician assistants and nurse practitioners) per 100,000 population
Data Source and Years(s): U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, September 2025
Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, National Plan and Provider Enumeration System, United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2026.
Primary care physicians are typically a patient’s first point of contact with the health care system and provide critical preventive care, disease management and referrals to specialists.
The Health Resources and Services Administration has estimated that, as of September 2025, an additional 14,900 primary care providers are necessary to meet current U.S. health care needs in designated health workforce shortage areas. That deficit is expected to grow to at least 20,200 physicians by 2036, reflecting continued strong demand.
Having a better or sufficient supply of primary care physicians in a community has numerous benefits, including:
Populations disproportionately affected by lack of access to primary care include:
Immediate and long-term measures to address the nation’s primary care shortage include:
Another important approach to the shortage is increasing diversity within the physician workforce, which includes establishing:
The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services implemented policy changes in response to the COVID-19 public health emergency to make telehealth more accessible. Continuation of those policies may allow more physicians to continue offering those services, expanding geographic access to primary care. Remote patient monitoring is one area that may be particularly well-suited to telehealth adaptations, allowing providers to manage chronic conditions in patients who face travel or transportation barriers.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has developed the Rural Health Strategy in response to the modern needs of rural Americans. Educational interventions are particularly effective at increasing and retaining a rural health workforce. These include selecting university students with rural backgrounds, providing university and post-graduate training in rural locations and supporting further education for qualified rural health professionals. However, more research is needed to address the physician shortage in rural areas.
Healthy People 2030 has multiple objectives related to primary care physicians, including:
2021 National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Report. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, December 2021. https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/research/findings/nhqrdr/2021qdr.pdf.
Horstman, Celli, and Corinne Lewis. “How Primary Care Is Faring Two Years into the COVID-19 Pandemic,” 2022. https://doi.org/10.26099/ZZVH-RB70.
Rajan, Suja S., Julia M. Akeroyd, Sarah T. Ahmed, David J. Ramsey, Christie M. Ballantyne, Laura A. Petersen, and Salim S. Virani. “Health Care Costs Associated with Primary Care Physicians versus Nurse Practitioners and Physician Assistants.” Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners 33, no. 11 (November 2021): 967–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/JXX.0000000000000555.
Russell, Deborah, Supriya Mathew, Michelle Fitts, Zania Liddle, Lorna Murakami-Gold, Narelle Campbell, Mark Ramjan, et al. “Interventions for Health Workforce Retention in Rural and Remote Areas: A Systematic Review.” Human Resources for Health 19, no. 1 (August 26, 2021): 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12960-021-00643-7.
Starfield, Barbara, Leiyu Shi, and James Macinko. “Contribution of Primary Care to Health Systems and Health.” The Milbank Quarterly 83, no. 3 (September 2005): 457–502.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x.
America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.
We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.