America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo

Unintended Pregnancy
Unintended Pregnancy in Nevada
Nevada

Explore national- and state-level data for hundreds of health, environmental and socioeconomic measures, including background information about each measure. Use features on this page to find measures; view subpopulations, trends and rankings; and download and share content.

How to use this page

Unintended Pregnancy in depth:

Unintended Pregnancy by State

Percentage of women with a recent live birth who did not want to become pregnant or wanted to become pregnant later




Unintended Pregnancy Trends

Percentage of women with a recent live birth who did not want to become pregnant or wanted to become pregnant later

Trend: Unintended Pregnancy in Nevada, United States, 2023 Health Of Women And Children Report

Percentage of women with a recent live birth who did not want to become pregnant or wanted to become pregnant later

Nevada
United States
Source:

 CDC, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System or state equivalent

View All Populations
Compare States

Unintended Pregnancy

Trend: Unintended Pregnancy in Nevada, United States, 2023 Health Of Women And Children Report

Percentage of women with a recent live birth who did not want to become pregnant or wanted to become pregnant later

Nevada
United States
Source:

 CDC, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System or state equivalent

About Unintended Pregnancy

US Value: 25.5%

Top State(s): Vermont: 17.1%

Bottom State(s): Mississippi: 41.2%

Definition: Percentage of women with a recent live birth who did not want to become pregnant or wanted to become pregnant later

Data Source and Years: CDC, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System or state equivalent, 2021

Suggested Citation: America's Health Rankings analysis of CDC, Pregnancy Risk Assessment Monitoring System or state equivalent, United Health Foundation, AmericasHealthRankings.org, accessed 2023.

Unintended pregnancy is either unwanted (occurring when no children are desired) or mistimed (occurring at a different time than desired). Delayed or lack of prenatal care among women with unintended pregnancies can pose health risks to mother and baby. Births resulting from unintended pregnancies are associated with adverse health outcomes for mother and baby, including:

Public insurance programs, such as Medicaid, pay for 68% of unplanned births and 38% of planned births. In 2010, expenditures on unintended pregnancies by Medicaid and other public programs were estimated to be $21 billion.

Since the overturn of Roe v. Wade in 2022, abortion has been banned in many states, leaving nearly 30% of women of reproductive age living in states where abortion is unavailable or severely restricted. These new abortion restrictions could deepen inequalities in abortion access, contributing to more unintended pregnancies. 

The Guttmacher Institute estimates that 1.3 million unintended pregnancies were averted in 2014 by publicly funded clinics. Every public dollar spent helping women avoid unintended pregnancies saves about $6 in Medicaid expenditures for pregnancy-related care, for a net government saving of $10.5 billion per year.

The percentage of unintended pregnancies is higher among:

  • Women ages 18-29 years compared with older women.
  • Non-Hispanic Black women, who have a prevalence more than twice that of non-Hispanic white women.
  • Women with incomes below the federal poverty level compared with women with higher incomes. 
  • Women without a high school education compared with women with higher educational attainment.
  • Unmarried but cohabiting women compared with currently married women.

About 95% of unintended pregnancies occur in women who do not use contraception or use it inconsistently or incorrectly. Strategies to reduce unintended pregnancy among sexually active women include: 

  • Increasing access to contraception: In 2014, family planning services helped women avoid approximately 2 million unintended pregnancies that would likely have resulted in 900,000 births, nearly 700,000 abortions and close to 300,000 miscarriages. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommend that health care providers educate patients on the benefits of long-acting and reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods such as intrauterine devices (IUDs) and implants.
  • Improving correct and consistent use of contraception: Once inserted, LARCs don't require the user to do anything, making them far more consistent and easy to use than short-acting contraceptive methods. Increasing LARC use could also generate significant health care cost savings.

Educating male partners about pregnancy planning could also strengthen efforts toward preventing unintended pregnancies. Planned Parenthood and the CDC provide more resources on proper contraceptive use.

Healthy People 2030 family planning objectives include:

  • Reducing the proportion of unintended pregnancies. 
  • Increasing the proportion of women at risk for unintended pregnancy who use effective birth control.

Cheng, Diana, Eleanor B. Schwarz, Erika Douglas, and Isabelle Horon. “Unintended Pregnancy and Associated Maternal Preconception, Prenatal and Postpartum Behaviors.” Contraception 79, no. 3 (March 2009): 194–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2008.09.009.

Finer, Lawrence B., and Mia R. Zolna. “Declines in Unintended Pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011.” New England Journal of Medicine 374, no. 9 (March 3, 2016): 843–52. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.

Frost, Jennifer J., Lori F. Frohwirth, and Mia R. Zolna. “Contraceptive Needs and Services, 2014 Update.” Report. New York: Guttmacher Institute, September 27, 2016. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/contraceptive-needs-and-services-2014-update.

Fuentes, Liza. “Inequity in US Abortion Rights and Access: The End of Roe Is Deepening Existing Divides.” Guttmacher Institute, January 17, 2023. https://www.guttmacher.org/2023/01/inequity-us-abortion-rights-and-access-end-roe-deepening-existing-divides.

Guterman, Kai. “Unintended Pregnancy as a Predictor of Child Maltreatment.” Child Abuse & Neglect 48 (October 2015): 160–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chiabu.2015.05.014.

Kost, Kathryn, and Laura Lindberg. “Pregnancy Intentions, Maternal Behaviors, and Infant Health: Investigating Relationships With New Measures and Propensity Score Analysis.” Demography 52, no. 1 (February 2015): 83–111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13524-014-0359-9.

Qiu, Xing, Senmao Zhang, Xin Sun, Haiou Li, and Donghua Wang. “Unintended Pregnancy and Postpartum Depression: A Meta-Analysis of Cohort and Case-Control Studies.” Journal of Psychosomatic Research 138 (November 2020): 110259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpsychores.2020.110259.

Shah, Prakesh S., Taiba Balkhair, Arne Ohlsson, Joseph Beyene, Fran Scott, and Corine Frick. “Intention to Become Pregnant and Low Birth Weight and Preterm Birth: A Systematic Review.” Maternal and Child Health Journal 15, no. 2 (February 2011): 205–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-009-0546-2.

Sonfield, Adam, Kinsey Hasstedt, and Rachel Benson Gold. “Moving Forward: Family Planning in the Era of Health Reform.” Report. New York: Guttmacher Institute, March 1, 2014. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/moving-forward-family-planning-era-health-reform.

Sonfield, Adam, and Kathryn Kost. “Public Costs from Unintended Pregnancies and the Role of Public Insurance Programs in Paying for Pregnancy-Related Care: National and State Estimates for 2010.” New York: Guttmacher Institute, February 1, 2015. https://www.guttmacher.org/report/public-costs-unintended-pregnancies-and-role-public-insurance-programs-paying-pregnancy.

Trussell, James, Nathaniel Henry, Fareen Hassan, Alexander Prezioso, Amy Law, and Anna Filonenko. “Burden of Unintended Pregnancy in the United States: Potential Savings with Increased Use of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception.” Contraception 87, no. 2 (February 2013): 154–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.07.016.

Current Reports

America’s Health Rankings builds on the work of the United Health Foundation to draw attention to public health and better understand the health of various populations. Our platform provides relevant information that policymakers, public health officials, advocates and leaders can use to effect change in their communities.

We have developed detailed analyses on the health of key populations in the country, including women and children, seniors and those who have served in the U.S. Armed Forces, in addition to a deep dive into health disparities across the country.