America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo
2025 Annual Report

Clinical Care

Download
Previous Page8 / 68Next Page
Close
Executive BriefForewordIntroductionNational SnapshotFindingsHealth OutcomesSocial and Economic FactorsPhysical EnvironmentClinical CareSpotlight: Rural CommunitiesBehaviorsState RankingsInternational ComparisonAppendixMeasures TableData Source DescriptionsMethodologyReferencesState SummariesUS SummaryAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
2025 Annual Report2025 Annual Report – Executive Brief2025 Annual Report – State Summaries2025 Annual Report – Economic Hardship Index County-Level Maps2025 Annual Report – Measures Table2025 Annual Report – Infographics2025 Annual Report – Report Data (All States)
‌‌‌‌‌
‌
‌
‌‌‌
‌
‌

Please tell us a little more about you

We appreciate you taking the time to help America’s Health Rankings better understand our audiences. Your feedback will allow us to optimize our website and provide you with additional resources in the future. Thank you.

Please select one option which best describes your profession or field of expertise

Journalist or media professional
Health Policy Professional
Public health professional (state, local, or community level)
Health care provider or administrator
Member of an advocacy group or trade organization
Academic, student, or researcher
Government administrator, legislator, or staffer
Concerned citizen
Other
Don't show me this again

Access to Care

Avoided Care Due to Cost

Cost is a central barrier
external-link
to accessing care for many Americans.50 Avoiding or delaying needed health care has been associated with increased preventable hospitalizations
external-link
and missed opportunities to prevent
external-link
disease and manage
external-link
chronic conditions, all of which can lead to worse and more expensive health outcomes.51–53
Changes over time. Nationally, the percentage of adults who reported a time in the past 12 months when they needed to see a doctor but could not because of cost increased 8% from 10.6% to 11.5% between 2023 and 2024.
Between 2023 and 2024, the percentage of adults who could not afford care due to cost increased:
  • 15% among college graduates (6.0% to 6.9%) and 14% among adults with some post-high school education (11.1% to 12.7%).
  • 14% among adults with incomes of $50,000 to $74,999 (10.7% to 12.2%) and 9% among adults with incomes of $25,000 to $49,999 (16.0% to 17.4%).
  • 10% among adults without a disability (8.1% to 8.9%).
  • 9% among women (12.4% to 13.5%).
  • 9% among straight adults (10.0% to 10.9%).
  • 8% among adults ages 45-64 (11.1% to 12.0%) and 6% among those ages 18-44 (16.1% to 17.0%).
  • 7% among adults who have not served in the U.S. armed forces (12.1% to 13.0%).
  • 7% among adults living in metropolitan areas (11.6% to 12.4%).
During this time frame, the prevalence of avoiding care due to cost increased in eight states. The largest increases were: 30% in Nebraska (8.8% to 11.4%), 29% in Louisiana (11.5% to 14.8%) and 24% in Montana (9.7% to 12.0%).
Differences. The prevalence of avoiding care due to cost varied significantly by income, age, educational attainment, disability status, geography, race/ethnicity, veteran status, sexual orientation and gender in 2024. The prevalence was:
  • 7.8 times higher among adults with incomes less than $25,000 (23.3%) compared with those with incomes of $150,000 or more (3.0%).
  • 4.5 times higher among adults ages 18-44 (17.0%) compared with those age 65 and older (3.8%).
  • 3.2 times higher among adults with less than a high school education (22.1%) compared with college graduates (6.9%).
  • 3.1 times higher among adults who have difficulty with cognition (27.5%) compared with those without a disability (8.9%).
  • 2.7 times higher in Texas (17.4%) than in Hawaii (6.4%).
  • 2.4 times higher among Hispanic (20.5%) compared with Asian (8.4%) adults.
  • 2.0 times higher among adults who have not served in the U.S. armed forces (13.0%) compared with those who have served (6.4%).
  • 1.9 times higher among LGBQ+ (20.6%) compared with straight (10.9%) adults.
  • 1.2 times higher among women (13.5%) compared with men (11.2%).
Note: No data were available for Tennessee in 2024 or for Kentucky and Pennsylvania in 2023. The values for adults who have difficulty with cognition (27.5%) and adults who have independent living difficulty (26.3%) may not differ significantly based on overlapping 95% confidence intervals. The same is true for Hispanic (20.5%), Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (19.0%) and other race (17.6%) adults; as well as Asian (8.4%) and white (9.2%) adults. Disability groups are not mutually exclusive.

Mental Health Providers

Mental health providers offer essential care
external-link
to adults and children with mental or behavioral disorders through assessments, diagnoses, treatments, medications and therapeutic interventions.54 A 2024 analysis found that more than 122 million
external-link
Americans were living in areas with a shortage of mental health care professionals, and only 26.4% of the population’s mental health care needs were met.55
Changes over time. Mental health providers — psychiatrists, psychologists, licensed clinical social workers, counselors, marriage and family therapists and advanced practice nurses specializing in mental health care — increased 5% nationally from 344.9 to 362.6 providers per 100,000 population between September 2024 and September 2025, and 57% (from 230.5) since September 2018.
Graphic representation of Mental Health Providers information contained on this page. Download the full report PDF from the report Overview page for details.
Between September 2024 and September 2025, the rate of mental health providers increased 5% or more in 34 states, led by: 10% in both Nebraska (346.9 to 380.7) and North Dakota (258.3 to 284.2), 9% in Montana (410.3 to 448.9), and 8% in West Virginia (206.2 to 223.2), Virginia (273.1 to 294.6) and Maryland (380.1 to 412.1).
Differences. The number of mental health providers per 100,000 population varied by geography in September 2025 and was 5.0 times higher in Alaska (822.0 providers per 100,000 population) than in Alabama (162.9).​

Uninsured

Health insurance coverage
external-link
has been shown to promote positive health outcomes, increase appropriate use of health care services and offer financial protection against high medical expenses.56 Nearly two-thirds of uninsured adults ages 18-64 report being uninsured because they cannot afford
external-link
coverage.57
Changes over time. Nationally, the percentage of the population not covered by private or public health insurance increased 4% from 7.9% to 8.2% between 2023 and 2024. In 2024, nearly 27.5 million people in the U.S. were uninsured, an increase of 1.3 million since 2023. 
Between 2023 and 2024, the uninsured rate significantly increased: 
  • 7% among those ages 19-25 (13.1% to 14.0%) and 2% among those ages 26-34 (13.8% to 14.1%).
  • 5% among Black populations (8.5% to 8.9%).
  • 3% among high school graduates (10.8% to 11.1%).
Between 2023 and 2024, the uninsured population significantly increased in eight states and the District of Columbia. The largest increases were: 67% in the District of Columbia (2.7% to 4.5%), 36% in North Dakota (4.5% to 6.1%), 26% in Kentucky (5.4% to 6.8%) and 21% in Minnesota (4.2% to 5.1%). During the same period, the uninsured rate significantly decreased 8% in California (6.4% to 5.9%).
Differences. The uninsured rate varied significantly by geography, educational attainment, race/ethnicity and age in 2024. The rate was:
  • 6.0 times higher in Texas (16.7%) than in Massachusetts (2.8%).
  • 5.7 times higher among those with less than a high school education (20.6%) compared with college graduates (3.6%).
  • 3.7 times higher among other race (19.3%) compared with Asian (5.2%) populations.
  • 1.9 times higher among those ages 26-34 (14.1%) compared with those ages 55-64 (7.4%).
Note: The values for other race (19.3%) and American Indian/Alaska Native (18.9%) populations may not differ significantly based on overlapping 95% confidence intervals. The same is true for Asian (5.2%) and white (5.3%) populations; as well as those ages 26-34 (14.1%) and 19-25 (14.0%).

Preventive Clinical Services

Cancer Screenings

Cancer screenings can help detect cancer early
external-link
, when treatment is most effective.58 Both mammography
external-link
and colorectal screening
external-link
have been found to be cost-effective methods of reducing
external-link
deaths from breast and colorectal cancers, which are among the most common types.59–61
Changes over time. Nationally, cancer screenings (a combined measure of breast cancer and colorectal cancer screenings) increased 15% from 56.0% to 64.5% between 2022 and 2024. Looking at the two cancer screening components separately, breast cancer screening increased 3% (72.1% to 74.5% of women ages 40-74 who reported receiving a mammogram in the past two years) and colorectal cancer screening increased 15% (61.8% to 71.1% of adults ages 45-75 who reported receiving colorectal cancer screening within the recommended time period). Despite improvements, screening rates remain lower than Healthy People 2030 targets to increase the proportion of females who get screened for breast cancer to 80.3%
external-link
and increase the proportion of adults who get screened for colorectal cancer to 72.8%
external-link
.62,63
Between 2022 and 2024, the prevalence of cancer screenings significantly increased:
  • 29% among adults with less than a high school education (37.5% to 48.4%), 18% among high school graduates (51.6% to 60.9%), and 16% among both adults with some post-high school education (56.0% to 64.9%) and college graduates (61.2% to 70.8%).
  • 22% among adults ages 45-64 (48.2% to 58.7%), 14% among those age 65 and older (68.0% to 77.6%) and 8% among those ages 18-44 (52.6% to 56.6%). 
  • 18% among women (51.3% to 60.6%) and 17% among men (58.4% to 68.4%).
  • 18% among adults living in metropolitan areas (54.6% to 64.5%) and 14% among adults living in nonmetropolitan areas (53.6% to 61.3%).
  • 17% among adults who have not served in the U.S. armed forces (53.7% to 62.9%) and 12% among adults who have served (67.6% to 75.4%).
  • 15% among LGBQ+ (51.5% to 59.3%) and 14% among straight (57.8% to 66.1%) adults. 
  • 15% among adults who have difficulty seeing (48.3% to 55.6%), those who have difficulty with self-care (51.8% to 59.6%) and those who have independent living difficulty (48.9% to 56.4%), 14% among adults who have difficulty with mobility (55.9% to 63.8%), 13% among both adults who have difficulty hearing (61.3% to 69.5%) and adults without a disability (57.9% to 65.2%), and 12% among adults who have difficulty with cognition (49.8% to 55.9%).
  • 14% among adults with incomes less than $25,000 (46.2% to 52.8%), 10% among those with incomes of $25,000 to $49,999 (53.7% to 59.2%) and 9% among those with incomes of $50,000 to $74,999 (60.6% to 66.3%).
During the same time, the prevalence of cancer screenings significantly increased in 47 states and the District of Columbia, led by: 28% in New Jersey (52.0% to 66.7%), 26% in Vermont (55.0% to 69.2%), and 24% in both New Hampshire (57.9% to 71.7%) and California (47.3% to 58.5%). 
Graphic representation of Cancer Screenings By State in 2024 information contained on this page. Download the full report PDF from the report Overview page for details.
Differences. Cancer screenings varied significantly by educational attainment, geography, age, race/ethnicity, income, disability status, veteran status, metropolitan status, gender and sexual orientation. The prevalence was:
  • 1.5 times higher among college graduates (70.8%) compared with adults with less than a high school education (48.4%).
  • 1.4 times higher in Rhode Island (75.2%) than in Wyoming (54.7%).
  • 1.4 times higher among adults age 65 and older (77.6%) compared with those ages 18-44 (56.6%).
  • 1.3 times higher among white (67.7%) and Black (67.4%) compared with Hispanic (52.8%) adults.
  • 1.3 times higher among adults with incomes of $150,000 or more (70.8%) compared with adults with incomes less than $25,000 (52.8%).
  • 1.3 times higher among adults with difficulty hearing (69.5%) compared with adults who have difficulty seeing (55.6%).
  • 1.2 times higher among adults who have served in the U.S. armed forces (75.4%) compared with adults who have not served (62.9%).
  • 1.1 times higher among adults living in metropolitan areas (64.5%) compared with adults living in nonmetropolitan areas (61.3%).
  • 1.1 times higher among men (68.4%) compared with women (60.6%).
  • 1.1 times higher among straight (66.1%) compared with LGBQ+ (59.3%) adults. 
Note: No data were available for Tennessee in 2024 or for Kentucky and Pennsylvania in 2023. The values for adults ages 18-44 (56.6%) and 45-64 (58.7%) may not differ significantly based on overlapping 95% confidence intervals. The same is true for white (67.7%) and Black (67.4%) adults; as well as Hispanic (52.8%), Asian (53.9%), American Indian/Alaska Native (54.1%), Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (55.1%) and other race (58.3%) adults; adults with incomes of $150,000 or more (70.8%), those with incomes of $100,000 to $149,999 (70.1%) and those with incomes of $75,000 to $99,999 (68.6%); and adults who have difficulty seeing (69.5%), those who have difficulty with cognition (55.9%), those with independent living difficulty (56.4%) and those who have difficulty with self-care (59.6%). Disability groups are not mutually exclusive.

Flu Vaccination

A flu vaccine is the best protection
external-link
against seasonal influenza viruses.64 Getting vaccinated can reduce
external-link
the severity of symptoms, defend against catching the virus and protect those with chronic illnesses.64 Hospitalizations for chronic conditions exacerbated by the flu, like diabetes and chronic lung disease, can also be reduced
external-link
by vaccination.64
Changes over time. Nationally, the percentage of adults who reported receiving a seasonal flu vaccine in the past 12 months decreased 4% from 42.9% to 41.3% between 2023 and 2024. The current rate does not meet the Healthy People 2030 target to increase the proportion of people who get the flu vaccine every year to 70% of the population
external-link
.65
Between 2023 and 2024, flu vaccinations significantly decreased:
  • 8% among both adults who have difficulty with self-care (45.7% to 42.1%) and those who have independent living difficulty (42.8% to 39.4%), 5% among those without a disability (41.5% to 39.6%) and 4% among those who have difficulty with mobility (50.8% to 48.9%).
  • 7% among adults ages 45-64 (42.3% to 39.4%) and 5% among those ages 18-44 (30.9% to 29.5%).
  • 6% among Hispanic (33.5% to 31.5%) and 4% among white (45.9% to 43.9%) adults. 
  • 5% among men (38.7% to 36.7%) and 3% among women (45.4% to 44.0%).
  • 5% among both high school graduates (36.2% to 34.5%) and college graduates (55.1% to 52.5%), and 4% among adults with some post-high school education (41.6% to 40.1%). 
  • 5% among adults with incomes of $25,000 to $49,999 (39.7% to 37.8%) and 4% among those with incomes of $50,000 to $74,999 (43.4% to 41.5%).
  • 5% among straight adults (43.6% to 41.6%).
  • 4% among adults living in metropolitan areas (43.2% to 41.3%).
  • 4% among both adults who have not served in the U.S. armed forces (40.9% to 39.2%) and those who have served (53.6% to 51.5%).
During the same time, the percentage of adults who received flu vaccinations decreased in eight states. The largest decreases were: 12% in Illinois (45.2% to 39.9%), 11% in Florida (37.6% to 33.5%), 8% in Ohio (42.9% to 39.6%) and 7% in Connecticut (50.8% to 47.3%). 
Differences. Flu vaccinations significantly varied by age, educational attainment, geography, race/ethnicity, income, disability status, veteran status, gender and metropolitan status. The prevalence was:
  • 2.1 times higher among adults age 65 and older (62.5%) compared with those ages 18-44 (29.5%).
  • 1.7 times higher among college graduates (52.5%) compared with adults who have less than a high school education (31.4%).
  • 1.6 times higher in Massachusetts (53.7%) than in Mississippi (33.0%).
  • 1.5 times higher among Asian (48.1%) compared with Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (31.5%) adults. 
  • 1.4 times higher among adults with incomes of $150,000 or more (49.5%) compared with those with incomes less than $25,000 (35.2%).
  • 1.3 times higher among adults who have difficulty hearing (49.9%) compared with those without a disability (39.6%).
  • 1.3 times higher among adults who have served in the U.S. armed forces (51.5%) compared with those who have not served (39.2%).
  • 1.2 times higher among women (44.0%) compared with men (36.7%).
  • 1.2 times higher among adults living in metropolitan areas (41.3%) compared with adults in nonmetropolitan areas (35.8%).
Note: No data were available for Tennessee in 2024 or for Kentucky and Pennsylvania in 2023. The values for Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (31.5%), Hispanic (31.5%), American Indian/Alaska Native (33.7%), multiracial (34.5%), other race (34.8%) and Black (35.9%) adults may not differ significantly based on overlapping 95% confidence intervals. The same is true for adults who have difficulty hearing (49.9%) and those who have difficulty with mobility (48.9%). Disability groups are not mutually exclusive.
America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo

Reports

Partner With Us

Explore the Data and Stay Tuned for New Insights

Want to be notified of our latest updates? Sign up now

America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo