America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo
2025 Health of Women and Children Report

Social and Economic Factors

Download
Previous Page6 / 67Next Page
Close
Executive BriefIntroductionSpotlight: Women in Rural CommunitiesNational SnapshotFindingsHealth OutcomesSocial and Economic FactorsPhysical EnvironmentClinical CareBehaviorsState RankingsAppendixMeasures Table - WomenMeasures Table - ChildrenData Source DescriptionsMethodologyReferencesState SummariesUS SummaryAlabamaAlaskaArizonaArkansasCaliforniaColoradoConnecticutDelawareDistrict of ColumbiaFloridaGeorgiaHawaiiIdahoIllinoisIndianaIowaKansasKentuckyLouisianaMaineMarylandMassachusettsMichiganMinnesotaMississippiMissouriMontanaNebraskaNevadaNew HampshireNew JerseyNew MexicoNew YorkNorth CarolinaNorth DakotaOhioOklahomaOregonPennsylvaniaRhode IslandSouth CarolinaSouth DakotaTennesseeTexasUtahVermontVirginiaWashingtonWest VirginiaWisconsinWyoming
2025 Health of Women and Children Report2025 Health of Women and Children Report – Executive Brief2025 Health of Women and Children Report – State Summaries2025 Health of Women and Children Report – Concentrated Disadvantage County-Level Maps2025 Health of Women and Children Report – Measures Table2025 Health of Women and Children Report – Infographics2025 Health of Women and Children Report – Report Data (All States)
‌‌‌‌‌
‌
‌
‌‌‌
‌
‌

Please tell us a little more about you

We appreciate you taking the time to help America’s Health Rankings better understand our audiences. Your feedback will allow us to optimize our website and provide you with additional resources in the future. Thank you.

Please select one option which best describes your profession or field of expertise

Journalist or media professional
Health Policy Professional
Public health professional (state, local, or community level)
Health care provider or administrator
Member of an advocacy group or trade organization
Academic, student, or researcher
Government administrator, legislator, or staffer
Concerned citizen
Other
Don't show me this again

Economic Resources

Concentrated Disadvantage 

Graphic representation of Concentrated Disadvantage Components information contained on this page. Download the full report PDF from the report Overview page for details.
Concentrated disadvantage measures the percentage of households with children that are located in census tracts for which the averaged z-score of the following factors is above the 75th percentile: family households below the poverty line, female-headed households, individuals receiving public assistance, unemployed population age 16 and older and population younger than 18. It serves as an indicator
external-link
of community well-being and projected socioeconomic needs.36 Studies have found that living in areas of higher community socioeconomic disadvantage is associated with lack of access
external-link
to healthy foods and recreational areas; environmental hazards
external-link
, including lead exposure, poor air quality and substandard housing; and chronic conditions
external-link
such as obesity, asthma, depression, anxiety and sexually transmitted infections.36–38
Changes over time. Concentrated disadvantage increased 10% or more in 12 states and simultaneously decreased 10% or more in seven states between 2015-2019 and 2019-2023. The largest increases were: 54% in North Dakota (4.8% to 7.4%), 43% in Wyoming (5.1% to 7.3%) and 39% in Hawaii (14.7% to 20.4%). The largest decreases were: 40% in Idaho (12.8% to 7.7%), 39% in Utah (10.8% to 6.6%) and 29% in South Dakota (15.0% to 10.6%).
During the same time, several components of concentrated disadvantage decreased. The prevalence of family households below the poverty threshold decreased 8% (9.5% to 8.7%), and the prevalence of female-headed households (12.4% to 12.2%), individuals receiving public assistance (25.2% to 24.7%) and unemployed individuals (5.3% to 5.2%) all decreased 2%.
Differences. During 2019-2023, concentrated disadvantage was 15.0 times higher in New Mexico (46.6%) than in Vermont (3.1%).
Related Measure: Poverty Among Women
Nationally, the percentage of women ages 18-44 living below the poverty level decreased 2%, from 15.2% to 14.9% between 2022 and 2023. In 2023, more than 8.6 million women were living below the poverty level, a decrease of more than 100,000 women compared with 2022. Between 2022 and 2023, poverty among women significantly decreased 13% in Missouri (16.1% to 14.0%). 
Differences. In 2023, the prevalence of poverty among women significantly varied by geography and race/ethnicity. The prevalence was:
  • 2.9 times higher in Louisiana (24.0%) than in New Hampshire (8.4%).
  • 2.1 times higher among American Indian/Alaska Native (21.9%) compared with Asian (10.3%) women.
Note: The values for American Indian/Alaska Native (21.9%), Black (21.8%) and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (18.2%%) women may not differ significantly based on overlapping 95% confidence intervals.

WIC Coverage Among Children 

Children who live in food-insecure households are at increased risk of adverse health outcomes
external-link
such as asthma, depression and forgoing necessary medical care.39 The federal Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children (WIC)
external-link
has supported families across the United States for more than 50 years, providing health care referrals, breastfeeding support, nutrition education and additional food to low-income women and children at risk of hunger.40
Changes over time. Nationally, the percentage of children ages 0-4 eligible for WIC who received benefits in an average month increased 5%, from 49.9% to 52.2% between 2021 and 2022. During this time, WIC coverage increased 5% or more in 27 states. The largest increases were: 19% in both Delaware (46.8% to 55.6%) and Arkansas (32.1% to 38.3%), 13% in West Virginia (52.1% to 58.8%), and 12% in both New York (52.0% to 58.1%) and New Mexico (33.1% to 37.0%). The prevalence of WIC coverage also decreased 19% in the District of Columbia (56.9% to 46.0%) and 5% in New Hampshire (53.0% to 50.3%).
Differences. The prevalence of WIC coverage was 2.2 times higher in Vermont (72.9%) than in Louisiana (33.5%) in 2022.

Social Support and Engagement

Voter Participation Among Women

Voting is associated with better individual and mental health
external-link
, reduced community violence and lower unemployment rates.41 Women gained the right to vote
external-link
a century ago, and since 1980 they have consistently voted at significantly higher
external-link
rates than men.42,43 There is evidence
external-link
that women have different policy priorities than men, focusing on issues such as funding for public health.44
Changes over time. Nationally, the percentage of female U.S. citizens age 18 and older who voted in the last presidential election decreased 2%, from 68.4% to 66.9% between 2020 and 2024.
During this time, voter participation among women significantly decreased 17% in Arizona (76.5% to 63.3%) and 10% in Texas (66.3% to 59.9%).
Differences. Voter participation among women was 1.4 times higher in Minnesota (79.0%) than in Arkansas (54.6%) in 2024. 

Neighborhood Amenities Among Children

The health of individuals and communities is closely tied
external-link
to the environment in which they live.45 Neighborhood amenities
external-link
, such as recreational facilities, libraries, playgrounds and sidewalks, offer opportunities to socialize, play, exercise and enjoy one’s home.46 There is evidence that safe neighborhoods with opportunities for and access to community engagement and healthy lifestyle habits contribute
external-link
positively to physical and mental health.47
Changes over time. Nationally, the percentage of children ages 0-17 with access to neighborhood amenities (including all of the following: a park or playground; a recreation center, community center or boys' and girls' club; a library or bookmobile; and sidewalks or walking paths) increased 6%, from 36.1% to 38.2% between 2021-2022 and 2023-2024. In 2023-2024, 26.5 million children had access to all neighborhood amenities, an increase of 1.4 million children compared with 2021-2022. 
Between 2021-2022 and 2023-2024, the prevalence of neighborhood amenities significantly increased:
  • 9% among Hispanic children (35.6% to 38.7%).
  • 7% among girls (36.0% to 38.4%) and 5% among boys (36.2% to 38.1%).
  • 7% among children without special health care needs (36.8% to 39.2%).
During this time frame, neighborhood amenities increased 24% in North Dakota (33.6% to 41.6%) and 22% in Indiana (26.0% to 31.8%).
Differences. The prevalence of neighborhood amenities among children varied significantly by geography, race/ethnicity, caregiver educational attainment and special health care needs status in 2023-2024. The prevalence was:
  • 5.3 times higher in the District of Columbia (73.5%) and 4.1 times higher in Colorado (56.7%) than in Mississippi (14.0%). 
  • 1.7 times higher among Asian (51.1%) compared with American Indian/Alaska Native (29.8%) children.
  • 1.6 times higher among children with a caregiver who graduated from college (44.4%) compared with those who had caregivers with less than a high school education (27.9%).
  • 1.1 times higher among children without special health care needs (39.2%) than those with special health care needs (35.6%).
Graphic representation of Neighborhood Amenities Among Children By Caregiver Educational Attainment information contained on this page. Download the full report PDF from the report Overview page for details.
Note: The values for Asian (51.1%) and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (48.5%) children may not differ significantly based on overlapping 95% confidence intervals. The same is true for American Indian/Alaska Native (29.8%) and white (34.9%) children; and children with caregivers who had less than a high school education (27.9%) and children with a caregiver who graduated from high school (29.4%).

Reading, Singing or Storytelling Among Children

Reading aloud to children was described as the most important factor in developing literacy by the Commission on Reading’s 1985 landmark report Becoming a Nation of Readers
external-link
.48 Research has shown
external-link
that regularly reading aloud to children stimulates patterns of brain development that strengthen language, literacy and social-emotional skills at a critical age.49 Other language-rich experiences that benefit brain development and future school success include talking and singing
external-link
to young children.50
Changes over time. Nationally, the percentage of children ages 0-5 whose family members read, sang or told stories to them every day during the past week increased 5%, from 57.1% to 59.7% between 2021-2022 and 2023-2024. In 2023-2024, nearly 12.9 million children had someone read, sing or tell stories to them every day, an increase of 157,800 children compared with 2021-2022.
Between 2021-2022 and 2023-2024, the prevalence of reading, singing or storytelling significantly increased 6% among girls (58.4% to 62.0%). During this time frame, reading, singing or storytelling increased 20% in Virginia (57.4% to 68.8%).
Differences. The prevalence of reading, singing or storytelling varied significantly by race/ethnicity, caregiver educational attainment, geography and gender in 2023-2024. The prevalence was:
  • 1.9 times higher among white (67.6%) compared with Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (34.8%) children. 
  • 1.8 times higher among children with a caregiver who graduated from college (68.9%) compared with those whose caregivers had less than a high school education (39.1%).
  • 1.6 times higher in Vermont (74.7%) than in Mississippi (47.8%).
  • 1.1 times higher among girls (62.0%) compared with boys (57.6%).
Graphic representation of Changes in Reading, Singing or Storytelling Among Children By Caregiver Educational Attainment information contained on this page. Download the full report PDF from the report Overview page for details.
Note: The values for white (67.6%) and multiracial (67.2%) children may not differ significantly based on overlapping 95% confidence intervals. The same is true for Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (34.8%), American Indian/Alaska Native (43.7%), Black (46.5%), Asian (49.1%) and Hispanic (50.8%) children.

Education

Early Childhood Education

Evidence
external-link
suggests that early childhood education, combined with higher educational attainment, contributes to improved health and promotes health equity.51 Typically, children who attend early childhood education programs have reduced rates of teen births and teen crime, improved standardized test scores and increased high school graduation rates. 
Graphic representation of Significant Increases in Early Childhood Education information contained on this page. Download the full report PDF from the report Overview page for details.
Changes over time. Nationally, the percentage of children ages 3-4 who were enrolled in nursery school, preschool or kindergarten increased 4% from 46.7% to 48.5% between 2022 and 2023, returning to pre-pandemic levels. This means over 95,100 additional children ages 3 and 4 were enrolled in nursery school, preschool or kindergarten.
The rate of early childhood education enrollment increased in three states between 2022 and 2023: 19% in Arizona (33.7% to 40.0%), 10% in Texas (43.5% to 47.7%) and 7% in California (45.4% to 48.4%). 
Differences. In 2023, early childhood education enrollment among children ages 3-4 was 3.4 times higher in the District of Columbia (90.1%) and 2.4 times higher in Connecticut and New Jersey (both 65.6%) than in North Dakota (26.8%). 

Chronic School Absenteeism

Chronic absenteeism
external-link
is defined as missing 10% or more of the school year, whether the absence is excused or unexcused.52 Research has found that chronic absenteeism is strongly associated
external-link
with falling behind academically, becoming socially disengaged and dropping out of school.53
Nationally, the percentage of public school students who missed 10% or more of their school days in an academic year was 27.8% in 2022-2023, representing approximately 13.4 million students.
Differences. Chronic school absenteeism was 2.8 times higher in the District of Columbia (46.7%) and 2.6 times higher in Oregon (43.8%) than in New Jersey (16.7%) in 2022-2023.

Fourth Grade Reading Proficiency

Fourth grade reading proficiency is an important indicator
external-link
of adequate educational development.54 By the time a child reaches fourth grade, they are expected to be able to read to learn
external-link
other academic subjects.55 If a child is not proficient in reading by this age, it becomes harder for them to succeed academically. 
Changes over time. Nationally, the percentage of fourth grade public school students who scored proficient or above on the National Assessment of Educational Progress in reading
external-link
comprehension decreased 5%, from 32.1% to 30.5% between 2022 and 2024.56
Between 2022 and 2024, fourth grade reading proficiency decreased:
  • 17% among American Indian/Alaska Native (18.5% to 15.3%), 9% among Asian (57.7% to 52.3%), 6% among both multiracial (36.7% to 34.5%) and Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (21.4% to 20.2%), and 5% among white (41.0% to 38.9%) children.
  • 10% among boys (30.4% to 27.5%).
Graphic representation of Changes in Fourth Grade Reading Proficiency By Gender information contained on this page. Download the full report PDF from the report Overview page for details.
During this time frame, fourth grade reading proficiency decreased by the national change (5%) or more in 27 states. The largest decreases were: 18% in Nebraska (34.0% to 28.0%), 16% in Arizona (31.4% to 26.4%) and 15% in Florida (39.0% to 33.0%).
Over the same period, fourth grade reading proficiency increased 5% or more in 10 states and the District of Columbia, led by: 12% in the District of Columbia (26.5% to 29.6%), Nevada (26.9% to 30.0%) and Louisiana (28.3% to 31.8%); and 10% in both West Virginia (22.3% to 24.6%) and Maryland (30.6% to 33.6%).
Differences. In 2024, fourth grade reading proficiency varied by race/ethnicity, geography and gender. The prevalence was:
  • 3.4 times higher among Asian (52.3%) compared with American Indian/Alaska Native (15.3%) children.
  • 2.0 times higher in Massachusetts (40.4%) than in New Mexico (20.3%).
  • 1.2 times higher among girls (33.6%) than boys (27.5%). 
America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo

Reports

Partner With Us

Explore the Data and Stay Tuned for New Insights

Want to be notified of our latest updates? Sign up now

America's Health Rankings, United Health Foundation Logo